Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
话题下的常用词汇、短语
| 词汇 | 中文翻译 |
|---|---|
| Urbanization | 城市化 |
| Garnered | 获得 |
| Resounding | 响亮的 |
| Dubious | 可疑的 |
| Impractical | 不切实际的 |
| Incentivizing | 激励 |
| Cultivating | 培养 |
| Mandates | 法令 |
| Sustainable | 可持续的 |
| Legislative | 立法的 |
Possible version 1
In the contemporary context of increasing urbanization and waste production, the question of whether laws are necessary to compel individuals to recycle more of their waste has garnered significant attention. From my perspective, the answer is a resounding no.
A fundamental issue lies in the practical challenges of law enforcement. Despite the implementation of recycling regulations in certain regions, such as China, the efficacy of enforcement remains dubious. The notion of stationing officials beside rubbish bins to levy fines on non-compliant individuals appears impractical and ineffective, rendering such laws symbolic at best.
Rather than relying on punitive measures, alternative approaches have demonstrated promise in fostering a culture of recycling. Financial incentives, exemplified by the establishment of online second-hand trading platforms and the nationwide imposition of charges for plastic bags, offer tangible benefits for both sellers and buyers, thereby incentivizing recycling behavior.
Furthermore, education and public awareness campaigns play a pivotal role in shaping attitudes towards recycling. Initiatives undertaken by Chinese authorities, encompassing public advertisements and integration of environmental education into school curriculums, have succeeded in cultivating a sense of responsibility towards recycling, particularly among the younger generation.
In conclusion, while the imposition of laws may seem like a logical solution to promote recycling, practical considerations and the efficacy of alternative methods suggest otherwise. By harnessing the power of financial incentives and education, societies can foster a sustainable culture of recycling without resorting to legislative mandates.
(235 words)
Possible version 2
Nowadays, as urban development takes off, more and more waste is being produced, but not enough of it is recycled. Some people claim that the only way to increase recycling is make it a legal requirement. In my opinion, I disagree with this statement, as I believe that laws are not an effective way to make people recycle more. Instead, I think that financial incentives and education and propaganda are more useful methods to encourage recycling. In this essay, I will explain why I hold this view, with supporting evidence and examples.
The first reason why I disagree with the statement is that laws are not an effective way to make people recycle more, as they face many challenges in implementation and enforcement. In fact, regulations and laws have been enacted in some regions in China, but things seem to be the same. According to a survey, only 28% of Chinese citizens said they followed the waste sorting rules, while 72% said they either ignored them or did not know about them. It would be ridiculous to make an official stand right beside a rubbish bin and fine those who do not recycle, as it would sound more like a joke. Consequently, people who do not abide by the laws will not be punished in any form, and these regulations will finally become a piece of paper that no one would glance at. Laws are the last choice.
The second reason why I disagree with the statement is that financial incentives are a better way to make people recycle more, as they can motivate people to reduce waste and reuse resources. Chinese governments have built some online resale platforms, such as Xianyu and Zhuanzhuan, which encourage citizens to recycle daily items. For sellers, they can profit from useless goods, and buyers can have access to cheaper choices compared to first-hand items. According to a report, these platforms have helped save 3.2 million tonnes of carbon emissions and 1.4 billion kWh of electricity in 2019. In addition, Chinese governments have charged for plastic bags nationwide, which has forced more and more people to reuse plastics, instead of wasting them. This policy has reduced the consumption of plastic bags by 66% and saved 4.8 million tonnes of oil since 2008.
The third reason why I disagree with the statement is that education and propaganda are also important to make people recycle more, as they can raise people’s awareness and change their behaviour. China has advertised environmental awareness in public areas and on the Internet, raising people’s awareness of recycling. For example, China has launched a campaign called “Trash-Free China” to promote waste reduction and recycling among the public, especially the youth. What’s more, China includes related information in curriculums of all stages, from primary school to college. As a result, recycling has become a trendy lifestyle among teenagers, who are more willing to participate in green activities and initiatives.
In conclusion, laws are not needed to make people recycle more. Methods mentioned above are proved to be available and efficient. Nevertheless, we still have a long way to go regarding recycling. Therefore, I recommend that governments should adopt these methods and cooperate with the public and the private sectors to increase recycling rates and protect the environment.
(545 words)
发表您的看法